As the 2011-year comes to an end, so do the current student government officials at Utah State University. Along with elections come candidates, campaigning and the elections process.
During the election process last year, candidates approached students on campus, in classrooms and on buses with candy, hot cocoa, coupons and a computer asking for their votes.
Current ASUSU public relations director, Hannah Blackburn, distributed a survey to all Utah State Students in regard to last years’ voting process to provide improvements while in office.
Blackburn wanted to ensure that students had a better voting experience this year by making sure that the candidates were abiding by the new voting rules that were passed by legislation this year.
“I got awful feedback from students relating to the voting process. Students said it was a disruption to schedules, unorganized, and should be more esteemed,” Blackburn said.
With the feedback, Blackburn wanted to make sure voters felr that student government was helpful and especially wanted to ensure that the election process was not skewed and was ethically done.
Legislation was recently passed that candidates may only have one laptop at their booth and they are not allowed to distribute smart devices to other students to vote.
“In the past elections has been about candidates gaining votes rather than students gaining information and that will definitely change this year,” Blackburn said.
Lucy Wachtor, a student at Utah State University, participated in the election process last year. Wachtor found that voting in the student center was more convenient rather than voting at a candidate’s booth. Watchor felt pressured to vote for a particular candidate at booths.
Wachtor was one of many students who thought elections week as a hassle and an annoyance due to all of the begging candidates.
“I voted on a computer that was provided by ASUSU and thought this way of voting was much more fair,” Wachtor said.
Elections volunteer, Brooke Lawley, saw lots of students being pressured to vote for a particular candidate.
“I can see the problem with pressuring people into voting but at the same time I think it is important that the students do get a say in it,” Lawley said.
Lawly said she was never one to pressure a student into voting for a certain candidate, but encouraged voters to make their own decision.
“I do think this year will be better because it will be more regulated and it will be more fair all-around to candidates and voters,” Lawley said. “It will be more structured which is important in an election where every vote counts and it will be a more consistent process.”
A. Davis